skip to main | skip to sidebar

Reject the Law of the Sea Treaty

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Latest LOST Update


(10/30/07) Frank Gaffney, "LOST Runs Silent, Runs Deep," Washington Times


(10/30/07) Sen. James Inhofe, "Getting LOST," Washington Times


(10/30/07) Tom Deweese, "Sink the Law of the Sea Treaty," Canada Free Press


(10/30/07) Doug Bandow, "Make Way for a Second UN," The American Spectator


(10/30/07) Paul Weyrich, "Possibly the Final Push for the Law of the Sea Treaty," Townhall.com


(10/30/07) John Fonte, "LOST at Sea," National Review Online

Posted by BCH at 7:13 AM
Labels: Law of the Sea Treaty, LOST

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

LOST News and Updates

  • CPAS Press Release: "Committee Vote Underscores Lack of Unanimity on LOST, Urgent Need for Hearings by Other Affected Committees"
  • CPAS Press Release: "Giuliani Completes Roster of Republican Candidates Opposing LOST, Senate GOP Leadership United in Opposition"
  • CPAS Press Release: "Where's Rudy? Coalition Supports All Other GOP Candidates Who Oppose LOST"

Problems with LOST

  • 10 Reasons to Reject Lost (PDF)
  • Reagan's Concerns with LOST
  • LOST Poses Threats to U.S. Sovereignty
  • LOST Empowers the UN
  • LOST Mandates Technology Transfer
  • LOST Creates International Taxes
  • LOST Will Hamstring the U.S. Military
  • The U.S. Does Not Need LOST to Protect its Equities
  • LOST Subjects U.S. to Needless Litigation and Regulation
  • LOST Mandates Compulsory Dispute Settlement
  • LOST Creates Dangerous Precedents for "International Commons"
  • LOST Creates "Rigged Game" Decision-Making Mechanisms
  • LOST is a Backdoor for the Kyoto Protocol
  • China Can Use LOST to Counter the U.S.
  • Russia Can Use LOST to Support Untenable Territorial Claims

Navigation

  • LOST Commentary
  • LOST Historical Archives
  • LOST Multimedia
  • LOST Outreach

Law of the Sea Treaty Links

  • The ITSSD Journal - UN Law of the Sea Treaty

Blog Archive

About Me

BCH
I work for a non-partisan non-profit defense policy thinktank. (In the spirit of full disclosure I believe the organization I work for has, in the past, received about equal funding from both Boeing and Northrop Grumman, the two competitors for the tanker contract. Due to our taking a principled stand on this issue such funding may not be true in the future.)
View my complete profile